It seems like every event, people come up with new reasons not to cap. And in the middle of a hunt, there just isn't enough time to waste trying to explain why they are wrong.
I'm sure everyone has heard the one about "don't just cap and leave, it gives them points." I've said it before, I like to think of it as "I'm taking the points they're giving us." But it reached new levels this week. Someone pulled the line on me this week, and I tried to explain to him that if we control more rings, its okay to cap because we score more than them by trading caps. His reply: "It's useless to control more rings if we don't stay and defend them."
And then there was the guy who said "Don't cap because we're behind," and later "Okay, we're ahead now, go cap." By which time the other team controlled all the rings. It's like a self-fulfilling prophecy - by not capping earlier, it became a bad idea to start capping later after the other team already controlled everything and would win the points battle.
And I just didn't have the time to tell him about another match I had just finished, where we fell behind because we lost a couple of battles but came back and took the lead and eventually won because the other team was willing to trade caps when they were only scoring 1 or 2 points for a cap and we would get 4 or 5 points for capping it back.
There are definitely times when it is better to stay and defend what you cap. But there are also times when it is better to trade caps. It's not a one-size-fits-all situation.
Bookmarks